Comments for full-text diary

Comment on Sphinx performance – know your queries time by Vlad

Vlad — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:26:39 +0000

Baron, query-digest is just brilliant thing and I’m looking forward to add Sphinx support there. But it’s always about the time.

Comment on Sphinx performance – know your queries time by Baron Schwartz

Baron Schwartz — Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:17:37 +0000

If you used the same format as MySQL’s slow query log, then pt-query-digest would Just Work as a log aggregator. This would be very beneficial, because it’s a great tool with a lot of time invested into it.

Or you could write a module that understands the Sphinx log format, with unit tests, and contribute it… your choice :-)

Comment on Sphinx performance – know your queries time by vlad

vlad — Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:50:27 +0000

Sergey, yes, extended statistics are available as well, I’ll blog on that too, thanks for asking!

Comment on Sphinx performance – know your queries time by vlad

vlad — Sat, 29 Oct 2011 19:46:46 +0000

Oleg, apparently not. But it’s might be a good idea to have remote agent times in the SHOW META output. I’ll talk to Andrew about this, thanks!

Comment on Sphinx performance – know your queries time by oleg

oleg — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:08:01 +0000

It’s very good and usefull! Thanx^^)
Can i use this feature in SphSQL “SHOW META”?

Comment on Sphinx performance – know your queries time by Sergey Nikolaev

Sergey Nikolaev — Fri, 28 Oct 2011 06:43:53 +0000

Hi. Thanks for the feature. Are things like [ios=4 kb=0.2 ioms=23.3 cpums=3.7] supported in the new log format?

Comment on Sphinx performance – know your queries time by Yaroslav Vorozhko

Yaroslav Vorozhko — Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:21:52 +0000

Cool staff! Thank you!

Comment on dist_threads, the New Right Way to use many cores by Yaroslav Vorozhko

Yaroslav Vorozhko — Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:35:05 +0000

Very nice explanation. Thank you!

Comment on Sphinx @ Percona Live London & Tutorial (Maybe) by debaprasad pal

debaprasad pal — Tue, 13 Sep 2011 05:23:07 +0000

Require Sphx for my work…

Comment on How Sphinx relevance ranking works by shodan

shodan — Fri, 08 Jul 2011 08:26:34 +0000

@ping, I see your point. Yes, formally speaking, if you define keywords (!) as alphabet elements, and treat the query and the document as “strings” in that alphabet, then we’re indeed looking at substrings in such “strings”.

While formally correct, that’d be very confusing and hard to explain though. I would rather suggest talking of contiguous subsequences, i.e. ones that only allow picking contiguous ranges of elements, but disallow intermediate deletions.